Back To Blog

FMCSA Rule for Truckers: English Proficiency Paramount

Amaro Law Firm > Trucking Accidents > 18 wheeler accident > FMCSA Rule for Truckers: English Proficiency Paramount
FMCSA Rule for Truckers Puts English Proficiency in Driver’s Seat

Texas truckers could be facing a more complicated road ahead as a new English-language rule takes effect this summer. That’s because the new federal rule requires drivers to demonstrate English skills during inspections or risk being placed out of service.

FMSCA English Rule for Truckers That’s a major shift that could send shockwaves through the trucking industry while potentially reshaping hiring, training, and daily operations nationwide. Here’s why, looking at:

To explore more issues affecting the trucking industry, check out Why Texas Is Among the ‘Deadliest Dozen’ for 18-Wheeler Wrecks and Can AI Prevent Drowsy Driving for Truckers?

English Proficiency Requirements for Truckers: Details of the New Rule

On May 20, 2025, U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy signed an order to add some muscle to an existing English-language proficiency (ELP) requirement for truckers.

A Look at the FMSCA English Rule for Truckers Taking immediate effect, the tougher ELP enforcement rule comes sharper teeth, specifying that:

  • All roadside inspections will now begin in English.
  • If an inspector suspects that a trucker has a limited understanding of English, the driver will be required to complete a 2‑step test.
  • The test will include an interview, during which the trucker will be required to reply in English without the use of translators, cue cards, or apps.
  • If the trucker passes the first part of the test, they will move on to the sign recognition portion of the test. This will involve identifying various highway signs, including dynamic electronic messages, and explaining their meaning.
  • If the trucker fails any portion of the 2-part test, they can be cited and placed out-of-service for failing to meet language standards.
  • There is an exception for hearing-impaired truckers and those who have secured an exemption; these drivers will not be subject to the out-of-service penalty if they are unable to answer in English.

On May 22, 2025, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) issued a follow-up notice to clarify some details about evaluating drivers’ English proficiency. Notably, the FMCSA stated that for the sign recognition portion of the test:

The driver’s explanation may be in any language, provided the manager is able to understand the driver’s explanation.

Enforcement of this new rule began June 25, 2025, when ELP was included as out-of-service criteria for truckers.

Why a New ELP Rule for Truckers?

Aligning with an April Executive Order (“Enforcing Commonsense Rules of the Road for America’s Truck Drivers”), the new English rule for truckers reportedly stems from findings that, “drivers’ inability to read our signs and speak our language may have contributed to a series of fatal accidents.”

That’s according to authorities at the FMCSA, who have also stated out that:

  • Truckers who cannot adequately understand, read, or speak English are “not qualified to operate a commercial motor vehicle.”
  • A 2016 policy from the Obama era had rolled back enforcement of the ELP rule, instructing officials to not invoke out-of-service orders for truckers who violated the ELP requirements.
  • The new rule overwrites the 2016 policy to “ensure necessary enforcement of the ELP standard as prescribed by regulation.”
  • Regardless of changing policy, the ELP rule has had a history of inconsistent enforcement.

New English Trucking Rule: Proponents vs. Opponents

Causing a stir, the new ELP rule has some ardent supporters championing the stepped-up enforcement, along with worried critics raising real concerns.

A Look at the FMSCA English Rule for Truckers: Pros v. Possible Cons Proponents, including the American Trucking Association, commend the new guidance for its:

  • Safety-first mindset: Making sure all truckers understand roadway signs and driving instructions can only promote safety, supporters argue.
  • Uniform standards: With clear guidance and new requirements, proponents applaud the return to consistent enforcement after more than a decade of uneven application.

On the other hand, opponents argue that the new English language rule for truckers could result in:

  • Subjective testing: What does ‘sufficient’ mean when it comes to understanding and communicating in English? How can we be sure that personal biases won’t come into play? How would a thick accent be judged? These are just some of the questions critics are raising, with worries that testing will lack objectivity.
  • More disruptions: Sidelining truckers who are currently qualified (in every other way except for possibly the ELP requirement) could tighten the screws on an industry that’s already suffering from trucker shortages and stressed supply chains.

Commenting on the new ELP guidance, U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy stated:

America First means safety first. Americans are a lot safer on roads alongside truckers who can understand and interpret our traffic signs. This common-sense change ensures the penalty for failure to comply is more than a slap on the wrist.

What’s Next?

Despite being inspired by safety, the new English-language guidance undoubtedly brings up complex questions about fairness, regional impacts, and big-picture implications. How it all plays out and whether the upgraded enforcement will reduce fatal 18-wheeler accidents remains to be seen.

As regulators and the trucking industry brace for repercussions, one thing is clear—the road ahead will likely demand adaptation and accountability.